Thanks Chris.

Someone changed the thread title, I wasn't consulted prior to the change.

When I started this thread it was more about who Quinn is and how he got to the position postulated in "The Journal" article.

The issue is so divisive within our falconry community family it is ripping us apart but what I am more interested in is the roots behind those that believe live raptors are not private property.

Not being in agreement with a family members position is acceptable, attacking a family member is not. Trying to determine if the association administrative members are trying to promote personal opinions is acceptable, slandering the association is not.