Originally Posted by
MrBill
Geoff, I don't disagree with you on this point, primarily because I am in the camp that believes that language evolved. and we tend to think that evolution stopped with us, but I don't think so. However, I am also saying that our language--at whatever point in evolution--is (and has been) more than adequate to describe the intricacies of falconry. Just think of all that has transpired in the last 100 years as a result of our level of communication (IT for example); it's phenomenal, and makes falconry, which in the past you have described as pretty basic, seem like child's play.
Bill Boni