Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Is there a reason why Marshall hasn't made the HSL yagi standard on all new receiver?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    SE Coastal Georgia
    Posts
    444

    Default Is there a reason why Marshall hasn't made the HSL yagi standard on all new receiver?

    I think there would be an appreciation for this from those who have heavy investment in VHF tx's and want to upgrade - but have a hard time reconciling the additional yagi upgrade cost. Seems like it would make sense to make this the standard yagi on the FM 100 (like the FM 800). The FM 800 didn't get a price bump for this feature - why continue equipping the FM 100 with outdated technology? Am I missing something (no attitude, just asking)?
    Mike

    SE Coastal Georgia

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbird1 View Post
    I think there would be an appreciation for this from those who have heavy investment in VHF tx's and want to upgrade - but have a hard time reconciling the additional yagi upgrade cost. Seems like it would make sense to make this the standard yagi on the FM 100 (like the FM 800). The FM 800 didn't get a price bump for this feature - why continue equipping the FM 100 with outdated technology? Am I missing something (no attitude, just asking)?
    You get what you pay for.
    Isaac

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    775

    Default

    Standard marketing to put a little some thing special on the higher priced stuff for awhile before the lower end gets the upgrade. If the extra channels aren't worth an extra $200 maybe a more convenient yagi is. Chevy/GMC and Ford/Lincoln have been pulling it off for years
    Lew Roussel

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    4,298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbird1 View Post
    I think there would be an appreciation for this from those who have heavy investment in VHF tx's and want to upgrade - but have a hard time reconciling the additional yagi upgrade cost. Seems like it would make sense to make this the standard yagi on the FM 100 (like the FM 800). The FM 800 didn't get a price bump for this feature - why continue equipping the FM 100 with outdated technology? Am I missing something (no attitude, just asking)?
    The HSL is more costly to produce. The FM800 has a higher margin so that product could absorb it and it is an incentive to by a product on which they make more than an FM100 but obviously slightly less than they used to on an FM800.

    Maybe they should offer an upgrade price for an FM100 equipped with the HSL. Call them and see what they say. As my grandfather used to say, "all they can do is say NO". (well they could also hang up on you or laugh but they are unlikely to do that)
    Ron N1WT Vermont

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Orlando Fl.
    Posts
    906

    Default

    I got the FM100 with the HSL and it cost me $100 extra.I always wondered if the HSL worked as well as the full size.It didn't make sense to pay for the 800 when all I fly is 2 birds.
    Robert Miller

    Orlando, FL

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    4,298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rri32701 View Post
    I got the FM100 with the HSL and it cost me $100 extra.I always wondered if the HSL worked as well as the full size.It didn't make sense to pay for the 800 when all I fly is 2 birds.
    The difference is measurable (slightly in favor of full size) but such a small
    difference that the convenience makes up for it.
    Ron N1WT Vermont

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    SE Coastal Georgia
    Posts
    444

    Default Ron, you answered ny question....

    I had wondered if there was a cost differential in production of the two yagis. And it does make sense that if the FM 800 has a wider profit margin, it would be better positioned to absorb the added production cost. That is what I was wondering about - thanks!
    Mike

    SE Coastal Georgia

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    4,298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbird1 View Post
    I had wondered if there was a cost differential in production of the two yagis. And it does make sense that if the FM 800 has a wider profit margin, it would be better positioned to absorb the added production cost. That is what I was wondering about - thanks!
    The HSL elements are not just physically shorter, they also have loading coils which make up for it electrically. That is where the extra cost is. As usual with MRT stuff it is masterfully machined.
    Ron N1WT Vermont

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •