Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 106 to 107 of 107

Thread: Electronic 3-186 A

  1. #106
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    1,366

    Default

    I should have mentioned that the 3-186 is only required when moving birds from a propagation permit. In MT, falconry birds acquired or transferred, only need a state form.
    Ray Gilbertson-Montana

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Seattle, Wa
    Posts
    5,452

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by falcon56 View Post
    I should have mentioned that the 3-186 is only required when moving birds from a propagation permit. In MT, falconry birds acquired or transferred, only need a state form.
    Well, the 3-186a is required for transfer of ownership of MBTA raptors. If Montana is not using that form, they are capturing equivalent data and filing it for you.

    It is too bad that the arguements that falconry regs be modeled more like the MBTA duck regulations did not take hold. The duck regulations are about 3 paragraphs long, and are beatifically streamlined. That would have led to some great changes, and a dramatic reduction in regulatory hassle. But both regulators and falconers had grown too used to our current Jack-boot/Jack-boot-on-neck scenario. It never ceases to stun me at how fond falconers are of having that boot grinding on their metaphorical throat.
    Geoff Hirschi - "It is better to have lightning in the fist than thunder in the mouth"
    Custom made Tail Saver Perches - http://www.myrthwood.com/TieEmHigh/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •