Quote Originally Posted by Saluqi View Post
Here's the latest:

"Judge O’Neill found that licensed falconers have a First Amendment right to express themselves with their raptors that is subject to the strictest constitutional scrutiny."

Whatever that means, I guess "express themselves with their raptors" means charge money to do ads and show people their birds?

https://pacificlegal.org/falconers-w...Vtq09kubR6tLuw
Despite the PT Barnum-esque hoopla it the ruling means nothing other than the case can continue. I wonder if PLF has a sign in their office that says "This way to see the egress"?