Originally Posted by
MrBill
Barry,
I agree with you about NAFA's history of not listening to its members, but, that's been discussed ad naseum, so we had probably better let that go for the purposes of this thread. I would like to address your second point--dues equating to insurance.
People join most national "sporting" organizations to associate with people who have similar interests that they might feel passionate about. But, in our case we have a history of defending and protecting our sport, so you are right, Barry--joining NAFA for many is like paying insurance. Frankly, I view NAFA's roll as a national watchdog organization as important. But, again, Ralph was suggesting that members nowadays are more interested in what's in it for them personally, rather than focusing on the big picture (NAFA's roll in helping to ensure the future of falconry).
Bill Boni
Norman, OK
Well said Bill.
At the moment, with 43 states needing to ratify new regulations though, NAFA can and is going far beyond being 'insurance'.
Fred Seaman
“Ask, Listen, Learn, Grow”